Monday, 15 June 2026

Meet the 22 investors to know in robotics and physical AI

Aidan Madigan-Curtis, Raviraj Jain, and Matt Ocko
Aidan Madigan-Curtis, Raviraj Jain, and Matt Ocko
  • Investors are piling into robotics as AI moves from screens into the real world.
  • Robotics and physical AI startups have raised more than $23 billion this year.
  • BI identified 22 investors shaping the boom, from humanoids to defense tech.

For decades, software ate the world. Venture investors chased companies that could grow without factories, supply chains, or machines. Hardware was almost a dirty word.

But now, Silicon Valley is getting physical.

As the software boom cools and AI moves from chatbots into the physical world, investors are piling into robotics and so-called "physical AI," a term popularized by Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang to describe AI systems that can act in the real world. The pitch is that if AI transformed what happens on screens, robotics could transform work in warehouses, hospitals, construction sites, homes, and battlefields.

Venture capital investment in global robotics and physical AI has grown from around $4 billion in 2019 to $26 billion in 2025, according to PitchBook data. This year, companies in the space have raised more than $23 billion.

Several forces are driving the boom. Sensors, cameras, actuators, and other components have become cheaper and more capable. AI allows robots to move beyond rigid, preprogrammed behaviors. Talent from Tesla, Waymo, Amazon, and other hardware-building companies has learned how to deploy technology in the real world. And labor shortages and geopolitical pressure to rebuild supply chains have made automation more urgent.

"Now the cool kids have arrived," said Matt Ocko, cofounder and managing partner at DCVC, a venture firm known for backing deep-tech companies. Ocko said he and fellow investor Steve Jurvetson, an early backer of SpaceX, coined the term "deep tech" decades ago to describe companies "delivering existentially necessary and valuable results in the physical world."

The rush has also brought in investors with little experience in the category. Industry veterans say "hardware tourists" are flooding robotics cap tables, drawn in by hype and underestimating how hard it is to build machines that work reliably outside a demo.

Business Insider identified 22 investors, from established names to rising stars, who are shaping the robotics boom. Their bets span humanoids, autonomous vehicles, warehouse automation, defense robotics, and the software models that could define the next generation of machines. The list is alphabetical.

Aidan Madigan-Curtis, Eclipse
Aidan Madigan-Curtis, Partner, Eclipse
Aidan Madigan-Curtis

Madigan-Curtis began her Silicon Valley career at Apple, where she worked on global operations for the first Apple Watch. She later joined Samsara as an early executive and led operations as the company scaled.

When Eclipse approached her about investing, Madigan-Curtis saw an opportunity to back companies bringing technology into the physical world.

"It felt to me like there was such a gap between the digital world and the real world we all live in — the one where we drive down roads and go to the doctor," Madigan-Curtis said. "I thought, when does technology start to penetrate the real world?"

At Eclipse, Madigan-Curtis is part of a team of former operators investing in physical-world companies. She led the firm's investment in Verkada, which builds security cameras and software for businesses, and helped incubate Bedrock Robotics, a startup founded by former Waymo engineers that is automating heavy construction equipment. She also invested in Simbe Robotics, whose Tally robot scans store shelves to help retailers track inventory and pricing.

"For a long time, the hardware was the hardest part about robotics," Madigan-Curtis said. "The real frontier now is the intelligence layer and building true embodied AI."

Ajay Agarwal, Bain Capital Ventures
Ajay Agarwal, Bain Capital Ventures
Ajay Agarwal

Agarwal spotted the promise of warehouse robots long before Amazon wanted in. In 2004, he backed Kiva Systems, which pioneered warehouse automation by using fleets of mobile robots to bring products directly to human workers. Agarwal led every successive funding round, and when Amazon bought Kiva in 2012 for $775 million, BCV was the company's only institutional investor.

More recent bets include Vention, which lets manufacturers design and order custom factory equipment online; Gather AI, which uses autonomous drones to track inventory inside warehouses; and Mind Robotics, a Rivian spinout building AI-powered industrial robots.

Agarwal is perhaps the most prominent robotics investor arguing against humanoids. In a Wall Street Journal op-ed last year, he wrote that humanoids would prove to be a "parlor trick" with few practical uses.

His portfolio reflects that thesis: Gather AI's drones fly through warehouses, and Mind Robotics is focused on automating factory tasks rather than building human-shaped machines.

"There's a reason why humans fly planes and drive in cars," Agarwal said. "Because wheels and wings are more efficient than walking."

Bilal Zuberi, Red Glass Ventures
Bilal Zuberi
Bilal Zuberi

Zuberi began investing in deep tech nearly two decades ago, when a small cohort of investors, including him, realized most VCs were ignoring entire industries, including energy, defense, and 3D printing.

"We realized there's a very big TAM [total addressable market] that Silicon Valley was just not addressing," Zuberi said.

After more than a decade at Lux Capital, where he backed companies including Applied Intuition, which builds software for autonomous vehicles, and Saildrone, which makes autonomous ocean drones, Zuberi struck out on his own last year. Red Glass Ventures, named after Zuberi's signature glasses, is an early-stage fund where he works closely with founders and early teams.

Zuberi's robotics investments include a foundation model startup, a robotics data training startup, and Foundry Robotics, his only public robotics investment so far. Foundry is developing robots to automate factory assembly.

At the same time, Zuberi is wary of the hype around robotics.

"My yellow flags are up. The space is overheated, overcrowded, and a bunch of noisy investments are being made. People will lose money. We are somewhere near the top of the hype curve," he said.

Brian Zhan, Striker Venture Partners
Brian Zhan
Brian Zhan

Zhan did robotics research in college but became frustrated with the field's slow pace. He shifted into database research and joined Facebook after graduating.

He returned to robotics as an investor.

"Everyone around me agrees that it's too late to start a company in coding. Robotics is going to be the next major category," Zhan said.

Zhan practices what he describes as "nerdy investing." At CRV, he invested in Dyna Robotics, which is building foundation models for robots, and Skild AI, which is developing a general-purpose "brain" meant to work across different kinds of robots and tasks. On Skild, he missed the seed round, which went to his sister, Sequoia partner Stephanie Zhan, and Lightspeed's Raviraj Jain. He later joined the Series A.

Zhan's investments reflect his belief that robotics is still in the stage where the basic building blocks are being created. Instead of every robotics company teaching its machines from scratch, he believes companies like Dyna and Skild will provide the AI models that many future robotics companies use to help their robots see, understand instructions, and decide how to move.

Jeremy Levine and Talia Goldberg, Bessemer Venture Partners
Jeremy Levine and Talia Goldberg
Jeremy Levine and Talia Goldberg

Levine and Goldberg are helping lead Bessemer's robotics and physical AI investment strategy. The two have argued that robotics is nearing its "GPT-2.5 moment": models are getting better, but the gap between demos and real-world deployment remains wide.

The firm has backed a range of robotics companies, including Waymo, the autonomous-driving company; Mind Robotics, which is building factory robots; Foxglove, a robotics software company; Breaker, a defense robotics startup; DroneDeploy, which uses drones and cameras to map worksites; Auterion, which builds software for drones; and ANYbotics, which makes four-legged robots for industrial inspection.

As their portfolio reflects, Levine and Goldberg are especially bullish on defense robotics, predicting the category will produce the first $50 billion-plus robotics IPOs. They reject the idea that robotics is in a bubble, arguing that too little capital is flowing into the sector given the size of the opportunity.

"There will be 100,000x more robots on Earth in the next 10-20 years," Levine wrote in a recent Bessemer report.

Joanna Lichter, Emerson Collective
Joanna Lichter
Joanna Lichter

Lichter joined Emerson Collective in 2021 and leads the firm's physical AI investments.

Her portfolio includes Field AI, a startup founded by former NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory researchers. It builds software to help robots move through challenging environments, such as construction sites, on their own.

"Field combines three things we look for: a world-class technical team, a differentiated approach to a hard problem, and early evidence that the technology is working," Lichter said.

Her other robotics bets include Physical Intelligence, which builds general-purpose AI models for robots, and Agrippa, which applies robotics to agriculture.

For decades, Lichter argues, robots were too rigid to be broadly useful. Now, she sees signs that robots are beginning to handle new environments and tasks they weren't explicitly built for, though most of that progress remains in research labs.

"The physical transformation is just getting started," Lichter said. "And the prize is vastly larger than most people realize."

Kahini Shah, Obvious Ventures
Kahini Shah
Kahini Shah

Shah has been drawn to robotics since college, when she studied engineering at Carnegie Mellon University. At Obvious Ventures, Shah invests around a simple thesis: automate work that is dull, dirty, or dangerous. The firm has backed Dexterity, a warehouse robotics startup, and Pyka, which builds autonomous electric aircraft.

Shah's focus is general-purpose robotics, and she's currently interested in dexterous manipulation, the challenge of teaching robots to use their hands with human-like skill. The "hands problem," as it is often called in robotics, remains one of the field's hardest bottlenecks. That led to her investment in Eka Robotics, cofounded by MIT professor Pulkit Agrawal and former Google DeepMind robotics researcher Tuomas Haarnoja.

"I was looking for a world-class research team that's also commercially-minded," Shah said.

Shah said Eka's early demos, which show robot grippers nimbly clasping berries without squishing them and quickly screwing in lightbulbs, suggest its approach could help robots develop more capable hands over time. That could open the door to uses beyond factories and warehouses, including restaurants and homes.

She has also written personal angel checks into Field AI and XDOF, which develops infrastructure for robotics data collection and training.

Katherine Boyle, Andreessen Horowitz
Katherine Boyle
Katherine Boyle

Boyle's robotics investments are rooted in Andreessen Horowitz's American Dynamism practice, which she cofounded. The strategy focuses on companies supporting the national interest across aerospace, defense, manufacturing, and critical infrastructure.

Before joining Andreessen Horowitz, Boyle was a reporter at The Washington Post and later a partner at General Catalyst, where she invested early in Anduril, the defense tech startup building autonomous systems for the military.

She joined Andreessen Horowitz in 2022. Her portfolio includes Hadrian, which automates precision manufacturing for aerospace and defense; Saronic, which builds autonomous ships for the military; and Castelion, a defense startup developing hypersonic weapons.

Kelly Chen
Kelly Chen
Kelly Chen

Chen began her career on Wall Street. While running a mortgage-trading desk at Barclays, she started angel investing, including in an early satellite-constellation company. "I realized that I wanted to spend my career investing in this space," Chen said.

She later joined DCVC, where she invested in Agility Robotics, the humanoid robot maker; Fulfil, which builds automated grocery-fulfillment systems; and Recycleye, a robotics company using AI to sort waste for recycling facilities. Chen then became a founding partner at the NATO Innovation Fund, a venture fund backed by 24 NATO allies that is investing more than $1 billion in deep tech.

"My overall approach on the investing side has always been the same, which is how do we get to unit economics? What are the companies and industries where that is possible, or will soon be possible?" Chen said.

Her focus has shifted as hardware, computing power, and simulation tools have improved. She is now launching a new fund backing physical AI companies that address the economy's hardest physical bottlenecks: supply chains, labor, industrial resilience, and critical infrastructure.

Kevin Spain and Jake Saper, Emergence Capital
Kevin Spain and Jake Saper
Kevin Spain and Jake Saper

Before becoming a VC, Saper developed large solar projects in India. To get aerial images of remote sites in Rajasthan's Thar Desert, he once had to hire a hot-air balloonist to take photos.

So when he later met DroneDeploy as a young investor, the use case was obvious. The company's software lets drones map and photograph sites for industries like construction, agriculture, and real estate. Emergence backed DroneDeploy in 2015, with Kevin Spain leading the deal.

"Being a physical-world AI investor benefits a lot from having worked in the environments that you are funding," Saper said.

A decade later, Saper and Spain co-led Emergence's investment in Bedrock Robotics, a startup founded by former Waymo engineers that's automating heavy construction equipment like excavators. The problem was familiar to Saper, who had seen how hard it can be to find skilled labor on construction sites.

Spain has also backed Physical Intelligence, which is building general-purpose AI models for robots.

"We believe that there are going to be foundation models that any robotics company can pick up and attach to their hardware to facilitate any kind of physical-world task, and Physical Intelligence is building that model," Spain said.

Matt Ocko, DCVC
Matt Ocko
Matt Ocko

Ocko is a self-described "stubborn nerd" who has spent the past 25 years backing deep tech companies: startups built on scientific breakthroughs and advanced engineering rather than software alone.

On the day we spoke, the Trump administration awarded $2 billion in grants to nine quantum-computing companies, including $100 million each to DCVC-backed Atom Computing and Rigetti Computing. To Ocko, who founded DCVC in 2011, it was proof that deep tech bets can take years to mature, then become strategically essential and wildly lucrative.

DCVC's robotics portfolio includes nearly two dozen companies, including humanoid startup Agility Robotics, autonomous loading startup Slip Robotics, automated grocery fulfillment company Fulfil, and autonomous construction equipment company AIM.

"These companies are not the subject of week-by-week fawning Forbes articles," Ocko said. "But when they win, they win asymptotically. They win gigantically."

Neil Mehta, Greenoaks Capital
Neil Mehta
Neil Mehta

Mehta is known for concentrated, long-term bets on technology companies. Greenoaks began paying close attention to robotics more than five years ago, as AI and computer vision started making machines more useful in the real world.

Greenoaks has backed The Bot Company, the home-robot startup founded by Kyle Vogt, who previously sold Twitch and Cruise. The startup is building a wheeled household robot, rather than a humanoid, designed to help with everyday tasks. Greenoaks led a $150 million round in 2025 that valued the company at $2 billion.

Greenoaks led a Series B investment in Mytra, a company building warehouse robots that move goods across a modular 3-D storage system without requiring customers to rebuild their facilities. The firm has also invested in Mind Robotics, a Rivian spinout building robots for industrial deployment, and Physical Intelligence, which is building general-purpose AI models for the physical world.

Greenoaks' investments have been characterized by close partnership with founding teams and a focus on exceptional customer experiences.

Raviraj Jain, Lightspeed Venture Partners
Raviraj Jain
Raviraj Jain

Jain's interest in robotics began when he moved from a small town in India to Mumbai for college and joined IIT Bombay's robotics club. Years later, at Lightspeed, he started looking for companies using computer vision to bring machines into the physical world.

He first backed Dexterity, a warehouse robotics startup. Later, after what he described as many "near-death experiences" testing self-driving cars, he invested in Aurora, an autonomous-trucking company.

Jain's latest robotics bet is Skild AI, where he was the founding investor and now serves on the board. The startup is building a general-purpose "brain" meant to work across different kinds of robots and tasks. Jain's thesis is that general-purpose robots will not arrive all at once because there still isn't enough real-world data to train them.

"My view is that we need to develop specific skills in robotics and build those into economically viable models, which will then converge into truly general-purpose robotics," Jain said.

Sarah Guo, Conviction
Sarah Guo
Sarah Guo

Guo spent nearly a decade at Greylock, becoming the firm's youngest general partner in 2018, before leaving in 2022 to launch Conviction, an early-stage AI fund.

She was the first backer of Sunday Robotics in 2024, a home-robot startup she said stood out because of its mix of "completely cracked researchers, a real commitment to building products that got deployed, and an Elon-style religion on delivering a mass-consumer product."

Sunday is preparing to launch Memo this fall as part of a beta program. Memo is a general-purpose wheeled home robot that can do dishes, fold laundry, and pull an espresso shot.

Guo is clear-eyed about the difficulty of the category. Robotics is capital-intensive and technically demanding, and American companies have struggled in adjacent hardware races, from self-driving cars to consumer electronics. Chinese manufacturers are formidable competitors on hardware costs. But Guo said robotics also requires a complete system combining hardware, software, and AI, plus top-tier research talent.

She is betting on the space because she believes the US needs robots and has the talent to build general-purpose systems.

"In terms of AI that will change people's lives, I can think of few things as valuable as giving people their time back, or filling some of the gaps we have in labor, such as in health and elder care," Guo said.

Seth Winterroth, Eclipse
Seth Winterroth
Seth Winterroth

Winterroth is part of Eclipse's deep bench of investors focused on the physical economy. Since joining the firm at its founding in 2015, he said pure software investments have never excited him. "I've always been someone who enjoys zigging when other people are zagging," Winterroth said.

One early win was 6 River Systems, the warehouse robotics startup Shopify acquired for $450 million in 2019. The deal gave Winterroth a firsthand view of what it takes to build and sell robotics products.

Since then, he has built a broad robotics portfolio. He invested in Wayve in 2019, when the UK autonomous-driving startup's AI-first approach was still considered contrarian and the team had fewer than 20 people working out of a small Cambridge garage. Wayve is now valued at $8.6 billion and has a deal with Uber to launch self-driving vehicles in more than 10 markets.

Winterroth is also an investor and board member at Mytra, a warehouse-automation startup; Foxglove, a robotics software company; ForSight Robotics, which is developing a robotic system for eye surgery; and Blue Water Autonomy, a startup building autonomous naval ships.

"This is the very beginning," said Winterroth. "Anywhere that there is dangerous, dirty, and monotonous work being done in the physical world is ripe for robotic solutions."

Shahin Farshchi, Lux Capital
Shahin Farshchi
Shahin Farshchi

Farshchi's interest in robotics began with science fiction. He grew up watching Knight Rider and Star Trek, and said he was captivated by the idea that technology could give people superpowers. "A car that can drive itself felt like something that was achievable in my lifetime, even when I was a child," he said.

Decades later, as a partner at Lux Capital, Farshchi became an early investor in several companies that have defined modern robotics and autonomy, including self-driving-car startup Zoox in 2015 and warehouse-robotics startup Covariant in 2017. Both were later acquired by Amazon, in 2020 and 2024, respectively. He also backed Formic, a robotics-as-a-service startup that helps manufacturers deploy automation without paying for the equipment upfront.

Lux's broader robotics portfolio also includes Applied Intuition and Physical Intelligence.

"The zeitgeist today around robotics very much reminds me of the zeitgeist around self-driving cars back in 2012," Farshchi said.

Shaun Maguire, Sequoia Capital
Shaun Maguire
Shaun Maguire

Maguire's interest in hardware began at age 7, when his cousin showed up to Thanksgiving with a car full of computer parts and helped him build his first computer. He became obsessed with physics, earned a Ph.D. in quantum gravity at Caltech, and went on to found a space-launch company in 2009.

A few years ago, Maguire wrote an internal Sequoia memo he called the "Hardware Manifesto." His argument was that major software shifts depend on breakthroughs in hardware.

"You can't have the App Store without the iPhone. You can't have the iPhone without 20 years of work at Qualcomm and Broadcom building out cellular infrastructure. You can't have deep learning without the GPU," he said.

Maguire, who was also an early investor in SpaceX, believes AI will need a new generation of hardware to reach its full potential. He sees three forces pushing that shift faster than he expected: labor shortages, reshoring, and AI advances that make robots better at handling messy real-world situations.

His robotics investments include Neros, which develops unmanned drone systems for battlefield defense, and Mach Industries, a defense startup building unmanned hardware systems. He is especially excited about AMP Sortation, which uses cameras and robotic arms to identify recyclable items and sort them faster than people can.

Sven Strohband and Vinod Khosla, Khosla Ventures
Sven Strohband and Vinod Khosla
Sven Strohband and Vinod Khosla

Before becoming an investor, Strohband helped build one of the most important early autonomous vehicles. He was the lead engineer and project lead for Stanford's autonomous car Stanley, which won the 2005 DARPA Grand Challenge and is now featured at the Smithsonian.

Participating in the challenge was "mildly terrifying," Strohband said, but it also showed him why autonomy was starting to become possible. Sensor prices were falling, and advances in probabilistic robotics meant machines could begin making decisions under uncertainty rather than relying solely on prewritten rules.

Strohband joined Khosla Ventures in 2012, and his first investment was Blue River Technology, an agriculture robotics startup that used computer vision to distinguish crops from weeds. John Deere acquired the company for $305 million in 2017.

He now thinks about robotics investments in two buckets: companies building entirely new technical capabilities, and companies using modern robotics to solve specific customer problems. His recent bets include Waabi, an autonomous-trucking startup; AIM Intelligent Machines, which is building autonomy software for heavy equipment; and General Intuition, a research lab using games and simulation to train AI agents for real-world tasks. Strohband and Khosla Ventures founder Vinod Khosla co-led the firm's investment in General Intuition.

Khosla has also been spending more time on robotics, with investments in Physical Intelligence, Field AI, and Genesis AI, which is building AI models and hardware for robots.

"Almost everybody in the 2030s will have a humanoid robot at home," Khosla said last year.

Trae Stephens, Founders Fund
Trae Stephens
Trae Stephens

Stephens took an unusual path to venture capital. After studying at Georgetown's School of Foreign Service and working for a US intelligence agency, he joined Palantir as an early employee, helping grow its defense business.

Peter Thiel recruited Stephens to Founders Fund in 2014. At a firm retreat, Stephens met Palmer Luckey, and the two developed the idea behind Anduril: bringing a Silicon Valley approach to advanced autonomous systems for defense. Anduril is now valued at $61 billion, and the company's president has said it is a "heavy participant" in the Middle East conflict.

Stephens gravitates toward investing in companies that combine software and hardware to solve real-world problems. His robotics investments include Hadrian, which automates precision manufacturing for aerospace and defense; Gecko Robotics, which uses robots to inspect critical infrastructure; and Physical Intelligence, which is developing general-purpose AI models for robots.

He believes that the biggest robotics companies will not be built on hardware alone, but by combining AI, software, and manufacturing know-how into systems that work reliably in the real world.

Read the original article on Business Insider


from Business Insider https://ift.tt/Q5mdrbq

Sunday, 14 June 2026

The economy keeps adding jobs. Many job seekers still feel stuck.

Job seekers
The US is adding jobs on net, but it's still a tough time to be job-searching.
  • The job market is showing revived strength, despite big-name companies announcing layoffs.
  • The economy had its best three-month average job growth since early 2024.
  • But it's still hard for some to find a job, and inflation outpacing wage growth is a new issue.

From about 8,000 layoffs at Meta to thousands of cuts at Amazon, media outlets have been following high-profile employment changes.

However, cuts at major tech companies this year represent only a sliver of what's happening in the massive job market, filled with millions of workers and unemployed Americans across different industries and business sizes.

That larger job market is showing renewed strength, although there are still some bumps in the road. Overall job growth is more robust, layoffs remain pretty low, and it's not just the healthcare sector keeping it alive. On the downside, wage growth isn't keeping up with inflation anymore, while rising long-term unemployment and low hiring rates suggest it's still hard to find a new job if you're out of work.

The monthly jobs report out on June 5 showed the economy had three straight months of robust gains through May, well above what's needed to keep unemployment steady and the highest three-month average since early 2024.

"This spring really is solidifying that the labor market is returning to a growth pattern," said ZipRecruiter economist Nicole Bachaud. "Businesses are reaccelerating hiring, jobs are growing across different industries, and there's just a general sense of renewed energy in the market that was largely stagnant for most of the last year."

With now five months of data in 2026 from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we break down how the job market is looking.

Overall job growth is at its strongest level in over two years

Let's first look at the good news.

The US added 172,000 jobs in May, about double the expected gain. The same jobs report showed upward revisions to the previous two months: from a job gain of 185,000 to 214,000 in March and from a gain of 115,000 to 179,000 in April. Together, that makes the highest three-month average since March 2024.

Healthcare, which has been an engine of growth for the past couple of years, isn't the only field propping up the job market. Leisure and hospitality had the highest net gain last month, likely partly driven by World Cup demand, followed by government and healthcare.

While many sectors are adding jobs, Kory Kantenga, LinkedIn's head of economics for the Americas, said there's still a lack of hiring momentum across the board. He said healthcare is the only sector that's largely been consistent over the past few years.

"The success or not for job seekers depends upon what sectors they are searching in and their location," said Mark Hamrick, senior economic analyst at Bankrate.

Meanwhile, the April JOLTS report from the Bureau of Labor Statistics showed job openings surged to the highest rate since 2024, driven by professional and business services. Hamrick said the increase in job openings, muted layoffs and discharges, and low separations, "could set the stage for further acceleration in hiring."

Outside the gold-standard jobs reports from the BLS, private data releases showed the job market's strength. HR services platform Gusto highlighted in its monthly report that small businesses across most sectors added jobs last month, with gains across all US regions. ADP similarly reported that private job gains were strong across firm sizes and in most sectors, with its chief economist, Nela Richardson, saying there's sustained momentum heading into the summer.

The healthy job growth in the job market doesn't mean people should dismiss high-profile layoff news at large companies.

"A thousand people losing their jobs, that's a thousand people," Bachaud said. "That's a very real, tangible number; for those thousand people, it's a very terrible experience." She added that 1,000 job cuts at one company don't move the overall US employment needle.

But wages aren't keeping up with inflation, and white-collar work is stagnating

The economy does have some pain points: ongoing uncertainty from the Iran war, inflation outpacing wage growth, and increased long-term unemployment.

The robust job gains don't mean we are out of the woods from the low-hire job market. "Tech is low-hire, some fire, while other sectors are low-hire, low-fire," Laura Ullrich, the director of economic research in North America at the Indeed Hiring Lab, said.

Finding work is persistently hard in some white-collar fields. The financial activities sector, where employment has generally been falling for about a year, lost 22,000 jobs in May. The information sector, which includes media and tech, has mainly experienced monthly job loss over the past few years.

Data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics showed the hiring rate dipped in April to 3.2%, which Glassdoor's chief economist Daniel Zhao wrote is comparable to the 2010s, when the job market was still recovering from the Great Recession. Amid low hiring, people aren't feeling too confident about finding a job, as seen in the low 1.9% quits rate, compared to a high of 3% during the Great Resignation period of 2021 and 2022.

It's also still hard to get out of long-term unemployment, or being unemployed for at least 27 weeks. Monthslong employment can have financial consequences, especially since many states offer just 26 weeks of unemployment benefits. Of the 7 million unemployed people in the US, 27.5% had been unemployed for at least 27 weeks in May, which Ullrich said is fairly high in an economy with healthy job creation.

"People who have been unemployed are having a really hard time transitioning out of that unemployment, and employers don't really seem to be motivated to pull from that pool," Bachaud said.

Wage growth has recently crossed an unwelcome threshold: it isn't keeping up with inflation. Bachaud said this is especially creating financial strain for middle-income households. Inflation exceeded 4% for the first time since 2023 in May.

"More people are feeling worse off about their financial situation now than a year ago, and affordability is no doubt playing a role," Elizabeth Renter, senior economist at NerdWallet, said in written commentary. "Higher and higher gas and food prices impact households in a dramatic way — these are things we can't easily cut out of our budgets, or even reduce."

How are you doing in today's job market? Did you make a career trade-off, such as taking a lower-paying job because of better work-life balance? Reach out to this reporter to share at mhoff@businessinsider.com or fill out this form about career trade-offs.

Read the original article on Business Insider


from Business Insider https://ift.tt/tVfjL0s

How a Texas lawyer used AI to beat Meta in the social media addiction trial

Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg
Trial lawyer Mark Lanier represented the plaintiffs in the landmark social media addiction trial, where Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg testified.
  • Mark Lanier said he used AI before and during the social media addiction trial earlier this year.
  • Lanier, who won the case against Meta and Google, said AI has transformed his workflow.
  • He swears by an AI tool that he pays six figures annually for called Boodlebox.

One morning in February, Mark Lanier woke up after four hours of sleep and started preparing to cross-examine one of the wealthiest people in the world: Mark Zuckerberg.

His team had worked through the night, preparing material for the day ahead that he could then review in the hours before court, all with the help of AI.

Lanier, a nationally known Texas trial lawyer with a reputation for taking on major corporations in high-stakes trials, was representing the plaintiff in a landmark social media addiction case. He said AI allowed his team to do significantly more with the limited hours they had to prep outside the courtroom during the trial, which lasted over a month.

"It's as if I have 10 additional workers who are incredibly well-trained, who know the file inside and out, who work 24 hours a day and don't even need to take a break for the restroom, much less PTO," he told Business Insider, adding, "In the 10 hours I might be working outside of court, I can get 30 hours of work done."

AI in law has been touted both as a major opportunity and a cautionary tale, with many stories of hallucinations and fake citations. While the legal industry grapples with how to use AI, Lanier said it's been a "total game changer" for him.

Lanier won the case against Meta and Google, in which the jury found the companies negligent and ruled they knew their platforms were "dangerous" but failed to warn the plaintiff, who was awarded $6 million. The case was a bellwether for thousands of similar lawsuits brought against social media companies.

Mark Lanier
Mark Lanier said using AI has transformed his workflow before and during trial.

While Lanier had used the most popular AI products, he said the AI tool he relied on before and during the trial was Boodlebox, calling it "Disney World compared to a swing set in the backyard."

A leader in the education technology space, Boodlebox provides access to major models like ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini, allowing users to switch between them or compare results. It's also collaborative, allowing Lanier and his team of lawyers to work with the AIs in the same digital workspace.

Lanier worked with Boodlebox to create a custom license that costs him six figures annually and is tailored to his needs.

"We could, in essence, take my brain, take 42 years of my experience, take the things that I have learned and studied and published and not published and incorporate it into the brain that drove my AI queries and results," he said.

He relied on AI before and during the landmark trial

Lanier is careful when talking specifics about how he deploys his AI. He says it's a matter of "trade craft" and that his firm is "doing some things that nobody else is doing."

One example he gave included taking transcripts from court each day and asking different models to evaluate them. He said AI is also great for finding a more creative or visceral way to describe something in court. He even would feed AI jury notes that came up during deliberations and ask it to evaluate where the jury was in the process.

At the end of court each day, they'd meet in his war room, debrief, and assign tasks to everyone, such as pulling the five most critical documents supporting point A. The team would then break and do much of that work in Boodlebox, allowing him to review what they've put together and how. He said he and his team, which includes several of his daughters, spent thousands of hours on the platform.

While most of Boodlebox's clients are big universities, a company representative told Business Insider that the platform is also exploring more enterprise and law adoption, in part because of its work with Lanier.

Lanier said he doesn't use AI in the way that often gets people into trouble. "I'm not going to say, 'Go do my research and write my brief,'" he said, adding that there was one instance in the case where AI cited something from the record and he knew it wasn't correct.

"It's not unbridled," he said. "You are an important part of the equation."

His advice to other lawyers trying to use AI was to keep up with the developments in the rapidly evolving field. He has an AI team at his firm that sends him a document every Friday with all the developments in AI, typically three pages single-spaced.

"Next trial, I will make what I did last trial look like Fred Flintstone and the Stone Age," he said.

Read the original article on Business Insider


from Business Insider https://ift.tt/DaLMpIo

Saturday, 13 June 2026

For Gen Z entrepreneurs, franchising is becoming the new entry-level job

Bang Cookies co-owner Corey Bonalewicz (left) and Gen Z franchisee Kugan Suppiah (right) pose together at the grand opening of Suppiah's store.
Bang Cookies co-owner Corey Bonalewicz (left) and Gen Z franchisee Kugan Suppiah (right) pose together at the grand opening of Suppiah's store.
  • Young entrepreneurs are turning to restaurant franchising as a path to business ownership.
  • Millennials and Gen Z value franchise stability and guidance over the risks of independent startups.
  • Social media-savvy young franchisees boost engagement and bring fresh ideas, benefiting brands.

When Kugan Suppiah was 24, he wasn't thinking about climbing the corporate ladder. He was thinking about cookies.

The University of Oklahoma graduate spent months persuading his parents to invest with him in a Bang Cookies franchise in Oklahoma City after becoming convinced the gourmet cookie chain could succeed there.

Now 25, Suppiah is already scouting locations for a second store, though he doesn't necessarily see baked goods as his end goal.

"I've always been business-minded, so this was something that I've always wanted to get into," Suppiah said. "I'm definitely interested, down the line, in opening something of my own."

For now, he sees franchising as a way to get there.

He's part of a growing group of young entrepreneurs turning to restaurant franchising as a middle ground between traditional corporate careers and the risks of launching an independent startup.

Franchise brands say they're seeing increased interest from millennials and Gen Z buyers who want the freedom and ownership that come with running a business but value the training, support, and established customer base that the corporate connection provides.

Young entrepreneurs are buying into franchising

"A lot of Gen Z is less focused on following one traditional path and more interested in creating opportunities for themselves," said Ashleigh Ewald, a 23-year-old public policy graduate student and entrepreneur. "The appeal is really about independence and ownership."

At the sandwich and salad chain Chicken Salad Chick, executives say it's seeing a surge in younger franchise candidates, who frequently cite stability, structure, and built-in support as key reasons for exploring ownership. Gong Cha, a bubble tea franchise, said it has also seen growing interest from younger prospects. At 16 Handles, executives for the frozen yogurt chain say more than half of current and incoming franchisees are millennials, including two 30-year-old finance professionals in Brooklyn who opened a location last summer while keeping their day jobs and are already preparing to open a second store.

Andrew Titus, president of United Franchise Group, said the shift is noticeable. Historically, many franchisees were in their 40s or 50s. These days, Titus said he increasingly encounters owners closer to his own age, 29.

"I've definitely seen more and more millennials, Gen Zs getting into business ownership," Titus said. He underscored that franchising offers a level of certainty many younger entrepreneurs find appealing because franchisees receive support, training, and a proven playbook for operating the business.

A lower-risk path to business ownership

For many younger entrepreneurs, franchising is less about avoiding work than avoiding unnecessary risk.

The model offers the opportunity to own a business, build equity, and make independent decisions without having to build a brand, operating system, and customer base from the ground up. For some, franchising is the next step in an entrepreneurial journey that started long before they signed a franchise agreement.

Amaan Bhanji, now 22, began planning his Graze Craze franchise during his senior year of high school. After two years spent finding a location, coordinating a buildout, and completing franchise training, he opened the Arlington, Virginia, business in 2024.

"I knew in my gut that I needed to build something of my own," Bhanji said. "Attending university and working for someone else just did not appeal to me."

Bhanji said franchise ownership offered something he felt he lacked at the time: structure.

"I had no experience with building, opening, and launching a successful business," Bhanji said, adding that collaborating with United Franchise Group, which owns and manages the charcuterie board franchise Graze Craze, offered him the tools and hands-on training to support his venture.

That desire for guidance and support is a recurring theme among younger franchisees. For many, the appeal of franchising is not simply ownership — it's learning how to operate a business while still having the opportunity to shape it.

Corey Bonalewicz, Kugan Suppiah, Ganes Suppiah, and George Kuan pose at the grand opening of the Suppiah family's franchise.
(From left to right) Corey Bonalewicz, Kugan Suppiah, Ganes Suppiah, and George Kuan pose at the grand opening of the Suppiah family's franchise.

Suppiah said he was drawn to Bang Cookies not only because he liked the product but because the brand was still young enough for franchisees to influence its direction. He pitched adding a curbside pickup window to his Oklahoma City store; the executives loved it, and Suppiah worked with them to refine its design and marketing strategy.

That kind of involvement can also benefit franchisors. Several executives told Business Insider that younger operators often bring fresh ideas around social media, community engagement, and customer engagement. At 16 Handles, executives said millennial and Gen Z franchisees have been particularly effective at turning online buzz and viral menu items into store traffic.

The next generation of franchise owners

Industry executives say younger franchise candidates are also gravitating toward brands that feel authentic, community-driven, and culturally relevant. Still, there are significant barriers to entry.

Ewald said many of her peers are interested in entrepreneurship, but startup costs remain a major obstacle.

Titus said the high startup costs associated with larger, household-name chains such as McDonald's often put them out of reach for first-time operators, instead pushing many younger entrepreneurs toward smaller, faster-growing concepts with lower barriers to entry and more opportunities to help shape the business.

Bhanji used savings from jobs he'd held since middle school, support from family members, and financing to launch his Graze Craze franchise. It was worth the risk, he said, to have a proven framework to follow while learning how to run a business.

Suppiah sees franchising similarly. Running his Bang Cookies location has given him a crash course in operations, marketing, site selection, hiring, and securing an SBA loan — skills he hopes to apply to future ventures, including potentially launching a Malaysian-inspired concept rooted in his family's background.

Like Suppiah, Bhanji sees franchise ownership as a beginning rather than an endpoint.

"I have many aspirations and am open to continuing with franchise ownership as well as other ventures," Bhanji said. "I'm not closing any doors."

In a generation often associated with side hustles, creator businesses, and multiple income streams, franchising is increasingly being viewed not as a retirement plan or a fallback career, but as an entry point into entrepreneurship.

Read the original article on Business Insider


from Business Insider https://ift.tt/gIahH0Y

Friday, 12 June 2026

South Korea's AI-fueled stock market rebounds to cap a brutal week

Bank employees work in front of multiple monitors at the Hana Bank dealing room in Seoul, South Korea.
South Korea's Kospi capped a roller-coaster week as investors returned to semiconductor stocks.
  • South Korea's benchmark Kospi index rebounded dramatically to cap a roller-coaster week.
  • Chip giants Samsung and SK Hynix powered a Friday rally in AI-linked chip stocks.
  • The recent selloff may have helped cool excesses in the semiconductor space, KB Securities said.

South Korean stocks ended a turbulent week on firmer footing after a volatile stretch that underscored investors' sensitivity to swings in AI-related shares.

The country's benchmark Kospi index surged over 8% on Friday before paring gains to close the session up 4.6%, after President Donald Trump said the US was nearing a peace deal with Iran.

The rebound capped a rollercoaster week for one of the world's hottest stock markets. The benchmark index plunged over 8% on Monday as a selloff in US tech stocks rippled through Asia, before staging a sharp rebound and swinging for the rest of the week.

The Kospi finished the week down 0.5%, following a 3.7% decline the previous week.

The selloff hit the South Korean market particularly hard because of its heavy exposure to the global AI trade. The Kospi has more than tripled since the start of 2025, making it one of the world's best-performing — and most volatile — major stock markets.

As sentiment stabilized at the end of the week, investors returned to the semiconductor stocks that had borne the brunt of the downturn.

Seoul-based KB Securities said much of the valuation adjustment in semiconductor stocks has already taken place following the recent volatility.

"At present, however, much of that disparity adjustment has already taken place. This can be read as a sign that overheating in semiconductors has also largely eased," KB Securities analysts Euntaek Lee and Daeun Lee wrote in a Friday note.

On Friday, index heavyweight Samsung Electronics surged over 13% before closing 7.9% higher. Rival chipmaker SK Hynix, meanwhile, gained as much as 9.6% before ending 2.3% up.

Read the original article on Business Insider


from Business Insider https://ift.tt/DLGjNUk

Thursday, 11 June 2026

After seeing Parkinson's take his father, this Googler found a new mission: teaching AI to chase cures

Vivek Natarajan, a Research Scientist at Google DeepMind
Vivek Natarajan, a research scientist at Google DeepMind
  • Vivek Natarajan of Google DeepMind was inspired by his father's battle with Parkinson's disease.
  • Initiatives like Co-Scientist and Co-Clinician are pushing medical and scientific research forward.
  • Natarajan aims to close gaps between AI's scientific potential and real-world solutions.

Vivek Natarajan is one of the Google DeepMind researchers trying to prove that advanced AI can do more than improve search, ads, and recommendations.

His work sits at the center of one of Google's most ambitious bets: that AI can become a collaborator for doctors and scientists, helping diagnose disease, propose experiments, and speed up the search for new treatments.

For Natarajan, that mission stems from seeing his father suffer. His dad spent 35 years at a widely read Indian newspaper. Then Parkinson's disease began to change him. While Natarajan was completing a master's degree in the US, his father started showing physical and cognitive symptoms, and his mother took on the role of caregiver. Determined to finish his career on his own terms, his father continued working until retirement, before later passing away.

The experience left Natarajan with an urgent focus that has guided his career.

"I asked this question to myself, 'okay, where is AI going to generally have the most impact?' And to me, that answer felt like medicine and science," Natarajan told me in a recent interview. "That was influenced by what I was seeing in my personal life and with my family."

A sketch of Vivek Natarajan as a young boy with his family.
A sketch of Vivek Natarajan as a young boy with his family.

By 2017, he was at Meta, working in a leading AI lab as deep learning was moving from academic breakthrough to industrial engine. But after watching his father's decline, Natarajan found himself increasingly drawn to a different use for the technology.

He'd been thinking about healthcare since growing up in India, where access to care could shape a family's fate. As an undergraduate, he and a few friends mocked up a rules-based app called "Ask the Doctor Anytime, Anywhere." The technology was crude, but the ambition stuck.

At Meta, Natarajan saw what modern AI could do inside one of the world's most sophisticated technology companies. But he also noticed research from Google and DeepMind pointing in a different direction.

Google researchers were using AI to analyze retinal images and identify disease, while publishing work on breast cancer detection from mammograms. These were narrow systems, but they suggested that frontier AI could be aimed at medicine, not just online engagement.

In 2019, he joined Google after connecting with Greg Corrado, a founder of Google Brain.

"Greg was just starting to put together this team to work at the intersection of AI and medicine, and he told me all about it," Natarajan recalled. "I was excited, but I told him I knew nothing about medicine, and he said, 'just come over, and we'll teach you.'"

Inside Google, Natarajan found a culture that could be both liberating and frustrating. Healthcare did not move like consumer software. Progress depended on earning the trust of physicians, patients, regulators, and policymakers. Scientific rigor mattered as much as technical innovation.

What frustrated him was that Google could publish impressive papers in journals like Nature while seeing relatively few AI systems actually reach doctors and patients.

After settling in, he began focusing on deeper questions: reliability, uncertainty, generalization, and interactivity. An AI system that simply outputs a probability score is not enough for medicine. Doctors need explanations. Patients want conversations. Medicine is contextual and deeply human.

Corrado introduced him to Alan Karthikesalingam, a physician-scientist who had worked at DeepMind and shared a similar ambition. The pair were inspired by Google's biggest scientific breakthroughs, including AlphaGo and AlphaFold.

"I distinctly remember texting Alan like, 'Why are we not doing these kinds of things? What are we doing? We should be having the same amount of impact,'" Natarajan said.

LLMs and dosas

Vivek Natarajan, an AI researcher at Google DeepMind, speaks on stage.
Vivek Natarajan, an AI researcher at Google DeepMind, speaks on stage.

In 2021, the pair saw an early version of Google's PaLM model demonstrate something striking: it could learn from just a handful of examples. They sensed it could become the foundation for a new generation of medical AI.

Over dosas at dinner in Mountain View, they drafted a proposal for Google Brain's Moonshots program, which focused on riskier long-term bets. More than 50 researchers across Google Brain, Google Research, and DeepMind eventually joined the effort.

The first major result was Med-PaLM. The team wanted to test whether large language models contained useful medical knowledge. Using MedQA, a benchmark based on US Medical Licensing Exam-style questions, they watched performance improve rapidly. Within months, the models moved from near-random guessing to passing-level scores, and eventually to expert-level performance with Med-PaLM 2.

The work helped catalyze a broader push into medical AI. But Natarajan and Karthikesalingam were not satisfied. Passing a medical exam, Natarajan argued, does not make an AI system a doctor.

A Stanford talk

Their next project, AMIE, moved closer to clinical reality. The system was designed to take patient histories, reason through diagnoses, and communicate empathetically.

That work laid the foundation for Co-Clinician, a broader initiative that envisions AI functioning as a collaborative member of a care team, interacting as a go-between with patients and their physician.

Then the focus expanded from medicine to science itself.

In 2023, after Natarajan and teammate Tao Tu gave a Stanford talk on Med-PaLM, Stanford professor Gary Peltz approached them with a question: Could these systems generate scientific hypotheses, not just answer questions?

Many colleagues were skeptical. Hallucinations remained a serious concern. Natarajan and a small group pushed ahead anyway.

The result was Co-Scientist, a Gemini-based multi-agent system designed to help researchers generate, debate, rank, and refine hypotheses.

One of the first moments that convinced Natarajan this system might work came through two professors at Imperial College London, Jose Penades and Tiago Costa.

Those two researchers had spent roughly a decade investigating antimicrobial resistance. They had a breakthrough but had not yet published the results, making it an ideal test case.

The professors gave Google's system the same research challenge. Natarajan's team ran Co-Scientist for several days and sent back the results, expecting criticism.

Instead, Penades demanded to know whether Google had somehow accessed his computer. The results were that good.

Natarajan assured him they were not cheating.

"It's not just that the hypothesis they provided was the right one, it's that they provided another four, and all of them made sense," Penades told the BBC in an interview. "For one of them, we never thought about it, and we are now working on that."

Since then, Co-Scientist has been tested on other problems, including cancer drug repurposing and liver fibrosis.

In the liver-fibrosis project, the system looked for ways to slow or reverse liver scarring. It suggested several existing drugs that might help. In experiments conducted with Stanford collaborators using tiny lab-grown liver models made from human cells, some of those suggestions showed promise, including the FDA-approved cancer drug Vorinostat.

For Natarajan, that's the point of being at Google DeepMind. The company's mission is to build responsible artificial general intelligence. He sees projects like Co-Clinician and Co-Scientist not as a side quest, but as an expression of this mission — a way for general AI capabilities to help medicine and science move faster.

Natarajan is also clear-eyed about the risks. A bad scientific hypothesis can waste months of research. A medical model released too early can cause harm.

Still, his father's illness left him deeply aware of the gap between scientific possibility and real-world treatments — and the urgency to close this as quickly and safely as possible.

"I think we now have a line of sight towards understanding mechanisms of diseases very broadly," Natarajan told me. "Hopefully, we can put all of these learnings to work and really help accelerate finding cures for many of them."

Sign up for BI's Tech Memo newsletter here. Reach out to me via email at abarr@businessinsider.com.

Read the original article on Business Insider


from Business Insider https://ift.tt/kvREZo5

Palantir CEO says AI companies 'don't understand how unlikeable they are'

Palantir CEO Alex Karp is pictured.
Palantir CEO Alex Karp said that AI leaders were too future-forward.
  • Palantir CEO Alex Karp said that AI companies and their leaders don't know how unlikeable they are. "I told them this," he said.
  • "Most of them are chillaxing over their latte, reading a report about something that they don't understand," he said on CNBC.
  • Karp also bashed OpenAI's new deployment company, calling it a "complete farce."

Alex Karp thinks Silicon Valley's AI companies and their leaders are lacking one key trait: self-awareness.

The CEO of Palantir has an interesting position in the AI boom. Labs like OpenAI and Anthropic are both partners and competitors. In an interview with CNBC, Karp took some jabs at the those companies and their San Francisco-based work culture.

"They don't understand how unlikeable they are," Karp said. "I told them this. I probably shouldn't have."

The AI-pilled are also too future-forward, said Karp, who has criticized the San Francisco tech scene before. The AI labs believe that they "don't have to solve your problem today," because it will be solved tomorrow, he said. "It's largely religious."

Karp also criticized the AI companies' products. He said that they "don't actually work the way" customers expect, and that they're "very expensive."

Sentiment about AI might differ outside San Francisco, he added.

Several tech companies have been embracing the forward-deployed model for AI, including OpenAI and Google. That's a model that Palantir popularized — and Karp said the AI giants have so far done a bad job of it.

"Most of them are chillaxing over their latte, reading a report about something that they don't understand the technical capacity about," he said.

Karp specifically called out the OpenAI Deployment Company, calling it a "complete farce" and an attempt to "replicate Palantir." OpenAI did not respond to a request for comment from Business Insider.

While Karp said the AI leaders don't realize that they are unlikable, he clarified that doesn't mean he personally feels that way. He shouted out Sam Altman and Dario Amodei as providing "some of the best and most interesting conversations I've had in business."

He narrowed in on Anthropic's Amodei. "He's a very, very important person," Karp said, and "he believes what he's saying."

That doesn't mean they don't still butt heads.

"I believe that we need heaven on earth, not heaven in 20 years," he said. "We disagree on these things."

Read the original article on Business Insider


from Business Insider https://ift.tt/L5eTmsh

Meet the 22 investors to know in robotics and physical AI

Aidan Madigan-Curtis, Raviraj Jain, and Matt Ocko Eclipse; Lightspeed Venture Partners; Winni Wintermeyer Photography Investors are piling i...