Saturday 31 July 2021

Auto dealers say today's red-hot market is a 'bizarro world' unlike anything they've ever seen - with cars selling before they hit the lot and clunkers worth more than ever

Lincoln SUVs at a dealership.
Car dealers told Insider they've never seen a market like today's.
  • The pandemic has thrown the market for new and used cars totally out of whack.
  • Cars are flying off of lots as quickly as manufacturers can produce them, and prices are sky-high.
  • The buying frenzy has people pouncing on cars they never would have considered before.
  • See more stories on Insider's business page.

Cameron Johnson, a fourth-generation car dealer with nine franchises in Virginia, was taught growing up that every morning when a dealer wakes up, their used inventory is worth less than it was the night before.

But in today's absurd car market, that wisdom isn't holding up.

A buying frenzy coupled with an historic shortage of vehicles on lots has sent used-car values soaring nearly 30% since last June, according to Edmunds' automotive research. Over the last six months, Johnson's Magic City Auto Group has raised prices consistently, and the buyers just keep rolling in.

"I've definitely never seen this," he told Insider. "And I think if you had a group of the smartest people in a room a year ago, no one would have predicted this."

A massive shortage of computer chips has devastated car manufacturing for months, choking off the supply of new vehicles to dealers. High markups and scant options from assembly lines are fueling a boom in secondhand sales, chipping away at used inventories and driving prices skyward.

Rental-car companies that pared down their fleets when travel ground to a halt in 2020 have resorted to hoarding used vehicles. Meanwhile, low interest rates, a strong economic recovery, and fluctuating travel habits have kept consumer demand high.

It's completely upended the way car dealers do business.

Lee Walls, a salesman at Grainger Honda in Savannah, Georgia, told Insider his dealership would typically have between 300 and 400 new cars either on the lot or on their way there. Now, he's down to about 60.

These days, most new Hondas destined for Grainger's showroom are sold before they even hit the lot - and they're selling at or near MSRP. The dealership has changed its policy to make deposits non-refundable since so many buyers are clamoring for new cars.

Read more: Here's how EV startups like Rivian are tackling the chip shortage that's wreaking havoc for major automakers

At Magic City Auto Group's stores, too, cars are snatched up practically as quickly as manufacturers can ship them over. Margins are up and profits are solid, but the money is short-term, Johnson says.

"We're selling them faster than we can get them, which in a normal world would sound like a great problem," he said. But he'd readily give up the extraordinary margins for more volume, which keeps salespeople happier and creates more downstream revenue from service and trade-ins.

Everything is selling

With popular models so expensive and hard to come by, shoppers have been loosening their budgets and pouncing on vehicles they wouldn't have considered before.

Arizona-based Lifted Trucks - which takes used SUVs and pickups, jacks them up anywhere from two to eight inches, puts new wheels and tires on, and sells them through four locations across the state - has broken a sales record nearly every month since May 2020.

Many of its recent customers weren't seeking out a lifted pickup, they simply couldn't find the model they were after anywhere else, Chad Staples, the company's corporate director of training and recruiting, told Insider.

Pickups sold by Lifted Trucks in Arizona
Lifted Trucks has seen record sales and profits over the last year.

Moreover, vehicles that would've languished on Lifted Trucks' lots in normal times - ones with oddball paint jobs like banana yellow, orange, bright neon green, or Tiffany blue - are selling like hotcakes, Staples said. Desperate buyers are coming from farther away than ever, with one recent customer driving his trade-in from Pennsylvania.

Amid the insanity, margins are up around 30%, Staples said.

Car owners cash in

Dealers aren't the only ones benefiting from the insatiable appetite for used cars. Used-car owners are cashing in big on rising values.

The average price paid for a trade-in has shot up 75% year-over-year to around $21,200, according to Edmunds. Some car owners stand to make a killing, particularly if they have a vehicle they don't need. Staples, for his part, said Lifted Trucks has bought back numerous customers' vehicles for more than it initially sold them for.

Those with leased cars are making out like bandits, too. Peoples' off-lease vehicles, in many cases, are worth significantly more now than the buyout price they set in their contract years earlier, meaning lessees can essentially flip their leases to another dealer for an instant profit. Johnson, of Magic City, said he helped a recent customer buy out a lease for $40,000, then took the car in on trade for $48,000.

Some people have been making monthly payments and putting miles on cars that aren't even depreciating in value, Johnson said. "It's bizarro world," he said.

New-vehicle supply will only begin to improve toward the end of this year, according to forecaster LMC Automotive, so it could be quite a while before the market evens out. Johnson, for one, believes the pandemic may have changed car buying and selling permanently, as manufacturers realize they can ship out smaller numbers of vehicles with lower incentives.

"I don't think you're going to go back to seeing 900 cars on our lot anytime soon," he said. "The days of coming onto a lot and seeing 50 different Explorers to choose from are far away, if ever."

Are you a car dealer, owner, or private seller with a story to share about what it's like to buy and sell cars right now? Contact this reporter at tlevin@insider.com

Read the original article on Business Insider


from Business Insider https://ift.tt/3zRnWuT

If the minimum wage were $24 an hour and tied to worker productivity, a long-held trickle-down myth might actually come true.

Fair Wage Demonstration Hiring Washington DC
Activists participate in a "Wage Strike" demonstration in May in Washington, DC.
  • Paul Constant is a writer at Civic Ventures and cohost of the "Pitchfork Economics" podcast.
  • In his latest piece, he discusses the recent 12th anniversary of the last federal minimum wage raise to $7.25.
  • Constant says if the minimum wage were tied to increases in worker productivity, it'd currently be at $24 an hour.
  • See more stories on Insider's business page.

Saturday, July 24, was the 12th anniversary of the last time the federal minimum wage increased, to $7.25 an hour. This is, by far, the longest the nation has gone without an increase to the federal minimum wage since the labor law was first instituted in 1938. While many states and cities have long since raised their minimum wage to more than double the federal standard, $7.25 is still the wage for hundreds of thousands of workers in 20 states around the country.

While the federal minimum wage has stayed frozen in time for the last dozen years, prices have continued to increase. Economist Ben Zipperer reports that anyone who is "paid the federal minimum of $7.25 today effectively earns 21% less than what their counterpart earned 12 years ago, after adjusting for inflation."

At this point, the $7.25 minimum wage is a national embarrassment.

For decades, opponents claimed that raising the wage would kill jobs, close businesses, and move industries to states with a lower wage. But in cities like Seattle, where the minimum wage is now $16.69 per hour, those claims have been roundly disproven.

Study after study has shown that raising the wage doesn't kill jobs, raise prices, or shutter businesses because when workers have more money, they spend that money in local businesses, which then hire more workers to meet the increased demand.(You can find links to all those studies in a piece I wrote back in February debunking the five most common minimum wage myths.) Raising the wage is a no-brainer, but our lawmakers haven't found the political courage to act on it through years of Democratic and Republican leadership alike.

The one truly unanswered question that remains with the minimum wage is what standard should be used to determine the wage moving forward. A listener of the "Pitchfork Economics" podcast recently called in to ask why the minimum wage isn't tied to cost of living, for instance. Such a policy would have prevented the 21% decline in real spending power that minimum-wage workers are confronting right now.

As the system currently stands, opponents of minimum-wage increases only have to stall the legislative process to erode the strength and importance of the law, as these past twelve years of Congressional inaction have proven. It would make sense to peg the minimum wage to some sort of metric so it increases annually without any intervention from lawmakers.

Many states and cities around the country do this. My home state of Washington, for instance, pegs the minimum wage to inflation, so in January of this year the statewide minimum wage automatically ticked up from $13.50 to $13.69.

You could also argue that the minimum wage should be tied directly to worker productivity.

Virtually every Econ 101 class teaches the trickle-down myth that workers are paid what they are worth, and locking the minimum wage into national productivity numbers would be a way to finally ensure that claim is true.

This is the figure that would do the most for American workers. As a recent Economic Policy Institute paper found, productivity has increased by over 72% from 1979 to 2019, while worker pay has only increased by 17%. The minimum wage largely rose in lockstep with American worker productivity gains for its first three decades. But had the minimum wage kept pace with productivity increases since 1968, the federal minimum wage would be more than $24 per hour right now, according to the Center for Economic and Policy Research.

If we have learned nothing else from this shameful freezing of the federal minimum wage, it should be that the minimum wage is more than a number. No American should put in 40 hours of work only to find themselves trapped below the poverty line. Tying the figure to some kind of metric - be it cost of living, inflation, productivity, median worker pay, or something else entirely - is the only way to prevent 12 straight years of losses from happening to the American worker ever again.

Read the original article on Business Insider


from Business Insider https://ift.tt/3BUxhUB

Rep. Madison Cawthorn tried to board a plane with a gun and loaded magazine in February

Newly elected U.S. Rep Madison Cawthorn (R-NC) speaks as supporters of U.S. President Donald Trump gather by the White House ahead of Trump's speech to contest the certification by the U.S. Congress of the results of the 2020 presidential election in Washington, DC, on January 6, 2021.
Rep. Madison Cawthorn (R-NC).
  • Republican congressman Madison Cawthorn tried to board a plane while carrying a gun in February.
  • Newly obtained records show that North Carolina's Cawthorn was not fined or given a criminal referral.
  • Typically similar incidents would incur a fine between $3,000 and $10,000.
  • See more stories on Insider's business page.

Rep. Madison Cawthorn tried to board a plane while carrying a gun in February, according to newly obtained records.

The incident came to light after FireMadison.com, a campaign looking to unseat the Republican congressman, obtained audio recordings and records of the incident from Asheville Regional Airport Authority.

Records revealed that Cawthorn was attempting to board a plane in Asheville, North Carolina, on February 15 when airport security found an unloaded Glock 9mm handgun and a loaded magazine in his carry-on.

After finding the gun, airport police questioned Cawthorn, secured the gun, and wrote a report. Cawthorn was not charged with a crime or fined.

Cawthorn was permitted to pick up the gun on February 22 after returning from his trip.

David B. Wheeler, President of FireMadison.com, said in a statement that the incident was "a serious violation of the law" and questioned why Cawthorn had not been arrested or fined.

"If you or I brought a loaded gun to the airport, we would be arrested, fined $10,000, and end up in front of a judge
to answer for our illegal activity," he said.

Typically having a loaded firearm or an unloaded firearm with accessible ammunition at an airport checkpoint or on a plane carries a fine between $3,000 and $10,000 and a criminal referral.

TSA spokesperson Mark Howell told the Citizen Times that in almost all cases, those found to be improperly transporting guns face federal civil fines, and an elected official should not be excluded from the potential punishment.

He told the paper that Cawthorn's case from February was "still pending" and declined to comment on it.

Cawthorn spokesperson Micah Bock said the congressman had "erroneously" stowed the firearm in his carry-on instead of his checked bag.

"The firearm was secured and unchambered. Rep. Cawthorn endeavors to always follow TSA guidelines and quickly rectified this situation before boarding his flight," Bock said.

The 25-year-old congressman from North Carolina has gained a reputation for making controversial statements, including that Dr. Fauci should be prosecuted and that vaccine efforts could result in people's guns and bibles being confiscated.

Read the original article on Business Insider


from Business Insider https://ift.tt/3lgYUkA

Pimco’s Ivascyn warns of inflationary pressure from rising rents

Leading US bond manager says ballooning housing costs could push interest rates higher

from International homepage https://ift.tt/3fdO7DW

Struggling US renters at risk as eviction moratorium expires

Lifting of ban comes as billions in planned aid to tenants and landlords goes unspent

from International homepage https://ift.tt/2WvUrQM

Inflation here to stay, Russia’s central bank governor warns

Elvira Nabiullina signals policymakers are likely to stick with tough monetary policy stance

from International homepage https://ift.tt/3rIenLX

Jay Hambro, the ‘ultimate salesman’ behind Sanjeev Gupta’s GFG

Metal magnate’s deeply connected right-hand man opened doors to politicians and global banks

from International homepage https://ift.tt/3rLmRln

Malaysia Defers Special Parliament Sitting Citing Virus Risk



from Bloomberg https://ift.tt/3zXGnhg

Electric Car Maker Rivian in Early Talks for U.K. Factory: Sky



from Bloomberg https://ift.tt/3C0vGMZ

A crypto chief explains why investors need to ignore short-term price drops in bitcoin - and says innovation will always be way ahead of regulation

Bitcoin crypto currency physical banknote and coin imitations.
  • Investors shouldn't pay much attention to the short-term drops in the value of bitcoin, MoonPay's CEO said.
  • It's normal for regulation to be a couple steps behind financial innovation, Ivan Soto-Wright said.
  • Further waves of retail adoption will allow cryptocurrencies to have everyday use cases, he predicted.
  • Sign up here for our daily newsletter, 10 Things Before the Opening Bell.

Crypto investors shouldn't be too focused on short-term swings because prices will become less volatile as adoption expands, according to Ivan Soto-Wright, co-founder and CEO of MoonPay.

"Bitcoin is one of the best performing asset classes if you look at the last five years," he told Insider in an interview. "So when you take the long-term horizon, you don't look day-to-day or month-to-month."

Bitcoin has rebounded to trade near $40,000 after three consecutive months of losses that were driven by a host of worldwide crackdowns on crypto trading and mining. Experts across the digital asset space called China's crackdown the largest sovereign assault on the asset class since its inception, a report from Galaxy Digital showed.

It's gained 34% in value so far this year, and is 107% higher in the last 12 months.

Soto-Wright, who launched MoonPay in March 2019, got excited about cryptocurrencies after his friend wrote a thesis on bitcoin during college, making him see the potential of financial inclusion for both the banked and the un-banked.

MoonPay, which builds payments infrastructure for cryptocurrencies, is now live in 160 countries with over 250 partners including bitcoin.com and NFT marketplace OpenSea.

He said it's only expected for regulators to take their time in making sure customers are safeguarded, and for crypto-focused companies to find the right balance between financial innovation and customer protection.

"The great thing that will make the industry thrive in the long term is having clarity over what those rules are in different parts of the world," he said. "Regulators are always a couple steps behind the financial innovation component, and that's where some of the friction arises."

Soto-Wright spoke about ethereum's growing efficiency, and how blockchain technologists are committed to scaling digital assets through improvements and upgrades to base protocols.

The ethereum network underpins a number of different technologies, including sales of non-fungible tokens (NFTs), which come with huge hidden premia also known as "gas fees."

He said crypto skeptics are right in that digital assets cannot be used to buy something as simple as coffee, but waves of adoption are yet to come in and allow for scaling to everyday use cases.

But as more people enter the crypto-economy, it will progress and become less expensive to make transactions, just like telephonic communication evolved from pricey long-distance phone calls, to free video-conferencing over the likes of Skype and Zoom, Soto-Wright said.

Read More: The SEC is trying to make investing apps like Robinhood less 'fun' in order to protect investors - but these gamified features are actually a great idea

Read the original article on Business Insider


from Business Insider https://ift.tt/3fiOywO

Ark Invest's Cathie Wood compares Tesla to Apple, predicts mass technological disruption, and details the core purpose of crypto in a new interview. Here are the 10 best quotes.

Cathie Wood
Cathie Wood.
  • Cathie Wood likened Tesla to Apple and touted crypto as the internet's missing layer.
  • The Ark Invest CEO slammed the regulatory backlash against Didi and other Chinese tech companies.
  • Wood predicted technologies such as blockchain and clean energy would transform industries.
  • See more stories on Insider's business page.

Cathie Wood suggested Tesla will follow Apple in capturing the lion's share of its sector's profits, predicted new technologies will reshape entire industries, and explained what traditional finance professionals don't appreciate about bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies, in a five-part RealVision interview this week.

The Ark Invest CEO also bemoaned the recent crackdown on Didi and other Chinese technology companies, argued that long-term technology investments can matter more than profit margins today, and advised workers to switch jobs if their excellence goes unrecognized.

Here are Wood's 10 best quotes from the interview, lightly edited and condensed for clarity:

1. "I feel that I was put on Earth to do this, that if I had retired at 57 instead of starting ARK, that I would not be a happy woman. I feel like I'm a vessel for something that was meant to be."

2. "I've loved being a woman in this business. I've had amazing mentors who have given me growth opportunities. And if a person - a woman or a man - delights their bosses but does not get a shot at promotions even though the numbers are speaking loudly, you have to move on. Just cut your losses, and bring your brilliance and your ideas to another team."

3. "We are on the cusp of more change than has ever happened. There's going to be tremendous disintermediation and disruption. We see the energy sector, financial services, any industry touching the internal combustion engine and its suppliers, anything really physical in terms of being the touchpoint for the consumer, the point of sale - in harm's way."

4. "There's huge inefficiency in the research behind and the investment in Tesla, so much so that our target price right now for our base case is roughly $3,000. People think that's a crazy number. Right now, the stock is closer to $700. We believe that the reason there's such a big inefficiency in Tesla's valuation is the short-term time horizon of analysts and the wrong analysts following it." - Wood suggested analysts don't grasp the full potential of Elon Musk's clean-energy company.

5. "Apple understood that a cell phone was really a computer well before Nokia, Ericsson, and Motorola did. It designed its own chip because Intel and Qualcomm, they were going with the volume players, and Apple was nowhere, right? By designing its own chip, it now still has the lion's share of the profits in the cellphone market. Even though its share has gone down, its value has gone up. We think that's what's going to happen to Tesla."

6. "They're better-performing cars. They delight the consumer. This is how Apple won. This is how Tesla is going to win." - suggesting the quality and performance of Tesla's cars will give it an edge over rivals.

7. "These technologies needed 15, 20, 25 years of gestation before they were ready to hit prime time. Anyone running the kind of strategy back then that we at ARK are running right now, they were cheered on. It was hallelujah, the brave new world, rah-rah-rah-rah, everybody chasing and trying to one up one another, right? Today, we're considered such an odd duck." - contrasting the skepticism of Ark's investment style today with the widespread championing of technology before the dot-com crash.

8. "Execution to us does not mean hitting operating margins to the decimal point. In fact, we could care less about that. In the early days, we want them to spend. Our execution is around R&D - how much they're spending, are they spending it in the right places, or are they just throwing spaghetti against a wall." - emphasizing that Ark cares more about companies' technology investments than their profits today.

9. "The way China is behaving, very defensively, is anathema to the rest of the world, and probably not to the pleasing of its own population. There's a bit of a stifling going on here. Anyone with dreams of becoming a unicorn with more than a million users is going to have second thoughts, because the government is basically putting them on watch, you know? I don't think you encourage entrepreneurship that way." - commenting on Chinese regulators' recent crackdown on Didi and other domestic technology companies.

10. "People from the old, traditional world of financial services, they aren't thinking about bitcoin and cryptocurrencies as the missing layer from the internet. The internet was never conceived with commerce in mind. That's really what this is."

Read the original article on Business Insider


from Business Insider https://ift.tt/3idcfZf

Donald Trump did not appear to donate his salary from his last 6 months in office as promised, says report

Donald Trump
Former President Donald Trump.
  • Donald Trump promised to give away his presidential salary while in office.
  • The Washington Post was unable to account for his salary for his final 6 months.
  • Trump had become increasingly bitter about not receiving praise for donating his earnings.
  • See more stories on Insider's business page.

It is unclear what Donald Trump did with his salary from his last 6 months in office, which he promised to donate, according to The Washington Post.

While in office Donald Trump pledged to give away all of his $400,000 annual presidential salary. For the first three and a half of his presidency, he donated the money to federal agencies.

The Washington Post said it surveyed all major federal agencies and none reported receiving anything from Trump after a gift in July 2020.

The paper said it could not account for the the last $220,000 of his salary.

During the campaign trail in 2015 Donald Trump said that he would not accept a presidential salary if elected. The Constitution does not allow a president to forgo a salary, so Trump chose to donate his earnings to federal agencies instead.

While in office he donated $100,000 quarterly payments to federal departments such as the Department of Veterans and the Department of Health and Human Services.

His last known gift was to the National Park Service on July 23, 2020, according to government documents.

Washington Post reporter David Fahrenthold said that Trump had become increasingly bitter about not getting praise for donating his salary.

At a campaign rally in Arizona in October 2020 Trump said, "I'm the only president that did not accept a salary, which surprised me. It's $450,000. The only reason I mention it is they never talk about it."

Trump frequently claimed that no other president had ever refused their salary, which is untrue. Both Herbert Hoover and John F. Kennedy did the same.

Trump also got his salary amount wrong. The president receives $400,000 annually.

Despite donating his salary, Trump still continued to make money from his various businesses while in office. According to one review, Trump made $1.6 billion while he was president, meaning his donated salary accounted for 0.1% of his earnings.

The Washington Post clarified that their inability to account for his final 6 months of salary did not mean he definitely did not donate it. However, the lack of confirmation is unusual, and a marked difference from his first 3 and a half years in office.

The paper said it also asked Trump's business, and the former lawyer who helped arrange the donations, about the money, and neither responded.

Trump continues to receive a presidential pension of more than $220,000 a year.

Read the original article on Business Insider


from Business Insider https://ift.tt/2Vgcg5P

Here's what happens when nonprofit CEOs are kept out of the board meetings that decide their pay

business meeting
  • Since 2013, New York has prohibited nonprofit CEOs from attending meetings where their pay is discussed.
  • A group of researchers found this change lowered local nonprofit CEO salaries by 2% to 3%.
  • Nonprofits may also face pressure from donors to avoid executive pay that could appear excessive.
  • See more stories on Insider's business page.

The Research Brief is a short take about interesting academic work.

The big idea

Keeping nonprofit chief executive officers out of meetings when members of their boards discuss or vote on compensation can lead to these CEOs making less money and working harder.

This is a key finding from a study of nonprofit pay I recently completed with two fellow finance scholars, Benjamin Bennett and Rik Sen. We reached this conclusion after reviewing data for more than 14,700 nonprofits across the country from paperwork most nonprofits must file with the Internal Revenue Service every year, known as Form 990, and the associated Schedule J, which includes compensation.

We zeroed in on 1,698 nonprofits located in New York to see if their CEO pay changed after new regulations took effect in 2013. Since then, New York has prohibited nonprofit officers from being present at meetings where their pay is being discussed.

We found that compensation was an average of 2% to 3% lower than expected by comparing pay for nonprofit CEOs in New York with pay in other states. We also compared the change in CEO pay with compensation changes for other executives' pay at the same nonprofits - since they weren't affected by this legislation.

We also found that many nonprofits changed how they handled executive compensation. That is, they were more likely to set up compensation committees, perform an independent compensation review, or adjust pay to be in line with similar organizations. Nonprofit CEO bonuses also became more correlated with the growth of an organization's budget - a strong indicator of overall performance.

And we found that, despite earning less than they might have expected, nonprofit CEOs spent about 2% more time working - without any additional turnover.

Interestingly, we also determined that by some measures, the nonprofits became better-run after the legislation took effect. For example, 2% more people chose to volunteer, and funding from donations and grants grew by 4%.

Why it matters

High CEO pay is a hotly debated topic.

Nonprofit CEOs make considerably less money than corporate CEOs and have experienced a slower wage growth over the last decade. Based on our estimates, corporate executives saw their annual pay grow by 54% from 2009 to 2017 to an average value of US$3.2 million, while nonprofit executives experienced a 15% increase in pay, reaching an average value of $396,000 in 2017 - the most recent year for which we obtained IRS data.

Nevertheless, because most nonprofits are exempt from income tax and many accept donations, it's only natural that the government and funders would not want to waste their money on excessive compensation. For example, food bank donors might prefer to see nonprofits spend more of their dollars on feeding the hungry as opposed to perks and big pay packages.

In recent years, some alarming accounts of exorbitant CEO pay and self-dealing practices at nonprofits have come to light. These include the scandals that have rocked the Wounded Warrior Project and the National Rifle Association.

What's next

One possible reason why nonprofit CEO pay is growing much more slowly than for-profit CEO compensation is that nonprofit leaders are committed to specific causes and have more motives aside from money to excel at their work than their corporate counterparts. Other possibilities could be that nonprofits face pressure from donors to avoid high executive pay or that nonprofit CEOs have little leverage.

We hope that our future research will answer this question.

Ilona Babenko, associate professor of finance, Arizona State University

The Conversation
Read the original article on Business Insider


from Business Insider https://ift.tt/3j65QOU

A major curveball in retirement preparedness: divorce

Getty Images; Chelsea Jia Feng/BI Divorce can derail the best-laid retirement plans. Divorced baby boomers — especially women — often...