- On a recent trip from London to Amsterdam, I took the train there and returned by plane.
- The Eurostar journey took 4.5 hours, whereas my flight was just 75 minutes and cost $50 less.
- However, I had to spend about two hours queueing at airports due to staff shortages.
I recently traveled from London to Amsterdam for work. I got the Eurostar there and flew back. I've taken many flights before, including journeys to Amsterdam, but had never traveled by Eurostar.
One of the first things many people look at when they book transport is price. My Eurostar journey, which was on a Monday morning, cost $198, whereas the Thursday evening flight I took with budget airline EasyJet was far less.
Most airlines charge to bring luggage on board beyond a small bag. When I added on hold luggage, the price of my flight went up to $147 – meaning it was only $50 less than the Eurostar. The train doesn't make passengers pay extra to bring large luggage on board – an item of hand luggage plus two pieces of large luggage were included with my standard-class ticket.
The flight was much quicker than the train. My flight took around 75 minutes to travel from Amsterdam's Schiphol Airport to London Gatwick, whereas the Eurostar journey was four and a half hours. But other things added up to mean that both journeys took a similar amount of time.
EasyJet emailed me two days before my flight, saying: "There may be delays at the airport security control before your flight and we recommend that you arrive at Amsterdam airport 3 hours before your flight time."
Source: Insider
Photos shared on social media over recent weeks have shown huge lines of passengers waiting to pass through security at airports because of labor shortages coupled with a surge in the number of people flying. Some passengers have been arriving hours in advance of their flight as a result. Signs inside Schiphol told people not to arrive more than four hours before their flight.
When I got up there I was confronted with a huge line of passengers queueing to drop off bags at the easyJet desk. Most of the counters at the desk were closed.
Despite the airline telling people to arrive at the airport around three hours before their flight, a screen by the EasyJet check-in desk said that check-in wouldn't actually open until two hours before the flight departed. There were no members of staff round to ask, so I just decided to join the line anyway. It all seemed a bit chaotic and disorganized.
It took about half an hour for me to get to the front of the line and drop my suitcase off.
I then had to join a series of other lines to scan my boarding pass, pass through security, and have my bags checked.
A sign said that customers face longer lines than usual "due to crowds and staff shortages." Overall, I stood in lines for about 90 minutes to make it through to the departure lounge.
Source: Insider
Eurostar, in contrast, recommended that I arrived at St. Pancras 90 minutes before my train was due to depart – much later than at Schiphol.
There was a big queue for the Eurostar too, but it was relatively fast-moving and only took me about 30 minutes to scan my boarding pass, go through security like at airports, and get my passport stamped. Though I had to send my suitcase through a scanner, I didn't have to join a separate queue to check it in as hold luggage like I did at the airport.
I also was able to keep liquids in my bags when traveling by Eurostar, whereas hand luggage on planes is limited to 1 liter from bottles of up to 100ml each. Larger containers of liquids can be brought in your hold luggage on flights, but if I were traveling with cabin luggage only then this would have been a real perk to traveling by Eurostar.
Despite the huge queues for check-in and security, departures didn't seem too busy. There was a big line for the Jamie Oliver restaurant, though.
As a major international airport, Schiphol had loads of shops and restaurants. But what surprised me was that so many were closed. It was only around 5:30 p.m. and there were dozens of flights still due to depart that day.
There was still a lot to do while you waited for your flight, though. As well as €2 ($2.10) massage chairs, various types of seats, and even some individual workspaces, the airport has a "library". This was home to books about Dutch culture available in more than 40 languages.
Seating in the departure lounge at St. Pancras for Eurostar passengers.
As well as a couple of cafés, it also a duty-free store, which I hadn't expected to see.
Overall there wasn't as much to do in the Eurostar departures compared with Schiphol.
On the easyJet flight, seats are three abreast on either side of the aisle. Each seat had a fold-down table and space for luggage in the overhead lockers, although these got full quite quickly.
I was the only passenger in my row, which meant I had plenty of leg room and could stow my rucksack by the seat next to me, though being short may have helped. My seat was by the window, and I spent the journey reading my book and trying to sleep. The 75-minute flight was over very quickly.
On the Eurostar, there were pairs of seats on each side of the aisle, also with small fold-down tables. A few seats in each carriage were arranged in fours around a (very thin) table.
There were racks at the ends of each carriage for passengers to store large luggage as well as racks above the seats. Considering it was free to bring suitcases aboard, I was surprised the luggage racks weren't fuller.
The seat next to me was taken, but I still had plenty of space, and I felt like there was more leg room than on the easyJet flight. But the four-and-a-half hour trip felt very long, stopping off at Lille, France; Brussels, Belgium; and Rotterdam, the Netherlands before reaching Amsterdam.
Unlike on my flight, where electronic devices had to be kept in airplane mode, the train did have free WiFi – but it was very unreliable. I tried to use my laptop but kept losing my connection, and ultimately gave up and read my book instead.
I grabbed something to eat on both journeys. They both offered a meal deal with a sandwich, snack, and cold drink, costing 10.20 euros ($10.38) on the Eurostar and 8 euros ($8.14) on the EasyJet flight. Both meals were expensive and the menus limited, but you generally expect this for food on flights and trains.
When I arrived in Amsterdam on the Eurostar, I could simply grab my bag, hop off the train, and scan my ticket at the barriers to leave the station. Flying into London, however, I had to wait to be allowed off the plane, queue for passport control, and then grab my suitcase from luggage reclaim – this all took about half an hour, bringing my total queueing time for that journey to about two hours.
In addition, the Eurostar took me between stations in the center of each city – London St. Pancras and Amsterdam Centraal – which were much quicker, cheaper, and easier to get to than the airports my flight went between – London Gatwick and Amsterdam Schiphol, located in the outskirts of each city.
While the actual length of the flight was much shorter than the Eurostar, the two journeys took nearly the same amount of time when you factored in traveling to and from the airports, being told to arrive three hours before my flight departed, and waiting to get my bag and have my passport checked when I got off the plane in London.
And once you added hold luggage, the price difference wasn't too great either. Ultimately I preferred traveling by Eurostar because of its lower carbon footprint, slightly more spacious seats, and roomier carriages, but traveling standard-class on the Eurostar wasn't all that different from getting economy seats on a plane.
Read the original article on Business Insider
from Business Insider https://ift.tt/iaIDGRl
No comments:
Post a Comment